Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Aug 7 2012 reflections from 2007 batch Intern on a patient of sickle cell anemia

7th aug 2012'

I am Swati Patel, intern People's College of Medical Sciences, currently posted to medicine.
Today i met a 25 year old patient suffering from sickle cell anaemia from when she was just 5 yrs of age. After talking to her i felt it was important to actually experience a patient with a condition that i had just read from a book as a part of our curriculum. I felt i could relate much more when the patient tells me her problems and my mind starts thinking why did this happen...

I am convinced that spending time in the ward attending to patients can really help a lot in learning..
This patient had presented with extreme pain and localized tenderness and swelling in her right upper tibia which was being managed as osteomyelitis. Yesterday the bony swelling in her upper tibia had been aspirated and the material sent for culture.

 I read papers about occurence of osteomyelitis in sickle cell anemia as i was asked to find out if the fact that 'salmonella was the commonest organism as per our MCQ answers was actually a fact or perhaps just a myth.

One of them was from J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Oct;73(9):1281-94. They had studied "Fifteen patients who had sickle-cell disease and osteomyelitis (affecting thirty bones) and were treated with operative decompression and parenteral administration of antibiotics between 1973 and 1988. Staphylococcus aureus was isolated on culture of specimens of bone from eight to the fifteen patients; Salmonella, from six; and Proteus mirabilis, from one. Although Salmonella has been cited as the principal causative organism of osteomyelitis in patients who have sickle-cell disease, in these authors' experience Staphylococcus aureus was the most common infecting organism. Therefore, Salmonella may not be the most common cause of osteomyelitis associated with sickle-cell disease in all countries or in all areas of a particular country."

I found another review article Pediatrics Vol. 101 No. 2
pp. 296 -297
which looked promising as it seemed to address my question around
"the controversy around whether S aureus is the most common cause of infection in these children overall, or does Salmonella actually predominate. They began by stating "The authors of the chapter on osteomyelitis and septic arthritis in the current edition of a major pediatric text state that “Salmonella osteomyelitis tends to occur more often in children with hemoglobinopathies, although even in this group, S aureus remains the predominant pathogen."

On the other hand there are other authors who in their chapter on osteomyelitis and septic arthritis in the current edition of a major pediatric infectious diseases text state that “seventy percent of all lesions or blood cultures in children with hemoglobinopathies and presumed osteomyelitis yieldSalmonella microorganisms, 10% contain S aureus, and aerobic Gram-negative rods are isolated in 7%."

Wish i had the full text to figure out where this led.




Monday, August 6, 2012

August 4 2012 reflections from MD PGY2


Aug 4th 2012 – Today is the 4th day of my postings in a new unit in our medicine department as MD PGY2. We had comparatively lesser patients so there was not much work load, but then suddenly one of our faculty members called me to accompany another junior resident to see a patient in casualty which was a known patient of Mitral stenosis with regurgitation along with a prosthetic mitral valve now presented with atrial fibrillation and an episode of syncope.  

I found the ECG of the patient of to be of great interest as our faculty teacher told me that it had 2:1 block but when i saw the ECG to me it appeared to be just of 1st degree heart block.  i took the ECG  along the patient to another faculty with a special interest in cardiology and she confirmed my impression that the ECG had 1st degree heart block but she added that the patient also had intermittent 2:1 HB. 

I felt great wth the above and felt it was a very interesting learning experience. However i have a few grouses against the system that i thought i would share.Feeling tired now while writing all this, actually it was my night duty yesterday night. 

I feel it is foolish to expect a person working and rather running around the whole hospital with the same competency with which he walked into the hospital 32 hours before, and very inhuman to criticize, humiliate, scold, and discredit a person especially when s/he is working continuously since the past 24 hours without even taking a nap. It is extremely sad to find that residents after finishing such a grueling schedule have to again stand for consultant rounds and get a firing for them without another thought from them. Above all when we share our distress with seniors all we get is a consoling dialogue that this is a trend being carried on since ages... When someone greets me good morning on such mornings, i want to blurt out “what is so good about this morning?" :-(